Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Thought Provoking Tuesdays





A Plead for Responsibility


So many Christian organizations such as this one, attempt to rationalize and somewhat weaken the ties of Christianity with slavery.

It really disheartens me to know that many Christians refuse to acknowledge the church's wrongful participation in and agitation of enslavement in the Americas.

Not only because I am an African American does it bother me, but as a Christian, it really builds walls of separation when one feels as though he/she cannot speak freely about the past atrocities committed with full honesty and understanding being reciprocated.

One thing that really got under my skin about the featured article , is the fact that this "Christian" organization dares to say that the European- Christian slave trade participation was not nearly as horrible due to the fact that, "While the European involvement in the Trans Atlantic slave trade to the Americas lasted for just over three centuries, the Arab involvement in the slave trade has lasted fourteen centuries, and in some parts of the Muslim world is still continuing to this day."

For those who may have a hard time detecting my sarcasm used frequently throughout this post, I've especially noted the corresponding comments!
Oh, and before I begin to think how horrible it is to see the results of the slave trade, I need to keep in mind that (sarcasm) "While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Trans Sahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!"

My ancestors had it made then, right? (sarcasm)

I almost forgot that all American black slaves were lucky because (sarcasm), "While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service. "

What? Were African American slaves not sexual exploited, whores of their masters, did many black men not fight in a American wars that only liberated their masters?
Oh and then it goes on to say that, "While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and most of the children born to the women were killed at birth."
I must have read it wrong many times when it was stated that many forms of punishment were executed on slaves such as the separation of loved ones, branding, whippings, lynchings, amputations, and dare I add castration (sarcasm)?
How more noble are the Christians than the Muslims (sarcasm)? Well according to the article, "While Christian Reformers spearheaded the anti-slavery abolitionist movements in Europe and North America, and Great Britain mobilised her Navy, throughout most of the 19th Century, to intercept slave ships and set the captives free, there was no comparable opposition to slavery within the Muslim world. "
Not only is the article an obvious and horrible display of intolerance and hatred towards the Islamic people, but it also shows how much in denial many self-proclaimed Christians are in regards to the issues and effects of slavery as with many other things I plan to discuss in the coming weeks.
I could quote so many things that are easy to refute from this article , but nothing boiled my blood more than the author attempting to show how slavery has pagan roots, therefore cutting its ties from Christianity completely.
What I find is that although it's true that forms of slavery were practiced in many ancient civilizations such as the Roman, Egyptians, Grecian, and Babylonian empires, Christianity not only adopted the customs, but revolutionized it.
How?
It added the factor of race as a mark of inferiority. Yes, slavery is ancient and has been cruel for centuries before the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, but it was usually initiated by war, or greed for power, wealth, and/or land.
I don't find it surprising that the same racial method of separation used on African American slaves was later modernized a bit and used against the Jewish people. Another catastrophe!
European and white-American powers had to devise a way to sustain slavery amongst so many "conscience"- driven people. By claiming blacks, indigenous Americans, etc. to be inferior to whites and needed to be "Christianized" and "taken care of", many were somehow "released" from the guilt of such obvious hypocrisy of the Christian faith. The worst of this is that church condoned it and saw to it that the message was interpreted in such a way that it could be stated as Biblical!
Even the great and oft quote Martin Luther King, only a few decades ago, had to beg white moderates, including Christian ministers, to rise to task of ending segregation and Jim Crow laws in the South and join the now- famous Civil Rights Movement in his letter from Birmingham Jail. Please read in its entirety if you haven't already. You can read it here.
In 2009, I am pleading with Christian leaders, organizations, bloggers, and such to please acknowledge the wrong and show exactly how responsible Christianity was to the extinction of numerous tribes and people!
Although it may be hard to swallow, Christians must still rise to the occasion of attacking this issue with full out honesty and remorse for the tragedy that it is. To me, it's not a wonder why so many people have very radical views and opinions against Christians and their moral beliefs when some Christians still to this day try and rationalize Christian involvement in the slave trade and involuntary conversion of many people in America amongst many other questionable topics. Many others just ignore it all together.
The real irony of the featured article though, is that the magazine is based in South Africa.
Think about it!
Maya











2 comments:

Linda said...

ohh goodness, who dares to write such stupid statements!?

Those are just.....ridiculous.. It's like mussolini defending himself, saying 'hitler killed more jews than me, so I'm really a goody two shoes'.

I can't stand these things.. it's about time that the europeans (and white americans) take responsibility for the actions of their fathers, and don't just keep saying:

* I didn't do it
* YOU weren't enslaved, so what are you complaining?
* The arabs were worse
* You need to let the past be the past

Those comments make me furious....

Greetings from the netherlands! ;)

Nicole said...

Hey FreeMommie, I've been out of the blogging world for a while but wanted to stop and check in with my blog sisters and see what was going on in their corner of the world. Looks like I caught up with you on a passion-filled day.

(Before I forget, and off-topic, love the blog design!)

I skimmed the article you linked to, and I don't have the time required to really find out more about this organziation and what their agenda might be in writing this article. Certainly though, to claim that North American slavery was humane based on the idea that it allowed slaves to be Christians and have families is not only callous but it's wrong. One of the most essential acts that we do as believers in Christ is to read the word of God, which slaves were legally forbidden to do in most if not all slave states.

Slaves were also not allowed to be legally married, and were given to one another in a form of marriage only upon the consent of their masters. And of course these unions were given no credence in the eyes of slave owners who wished to force themselves sexually on the women they owned, counting untold damage to any family units that tried to survive in this context. Children could be taken and sold at a whim. And that's just the tip of the iceburg, and is the reason that north american slavery, as it existed, could in no wise be considered the kind that appears to be condoned by the new testament, where masters are told to be kind to teir slaves and treat them as brothers in Christ. but of course you would want your brothe rin christ to be able to read the word, to marry, to lead and love and provide for his children, and to fellowship with other believers, and gain his freedom should he be able to, all new testament notions. None of these characteristics of brotherhood appeared in the master/slave relationship in the Americas.

That's just my two cents, but I hear your frustration, Free Mommie.

Blessings,

Nicole